Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder allocation risk example of" » "power allocation risk example of" (Expand search), "order allocation risk example of" (Expand search), "over allocation risk example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation in example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation with example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation during example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation first example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation prime example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation rank examples of" (Expand search), "coder allocation risk sample of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder allocation risk example of\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder allocation risk example of ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder allocation risk example of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.