Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder allocation on examples of" » "power allocation on examples of" (Expand search), "order allocation on examples of" (Expand search), "over allocation on examples of" (Expand search), "coder allocation of examples of" (Expand search), "coder allocation in examples of" (Expand search), "coder allocation and examples of" (Expand search), "coder allocation an example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation on example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation on samples of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder allocation on examples of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder allocation on examples of\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder allocation on examples of ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.