Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder allocation in precoder program" » "power allocation in precoder program" (Expand search), "order allocation in precoder program" (Expand search), "over allocation in precoder program" (Expand search), "coder allocation in proder program" (Expand search), "coder allocation in recovery program" (Expand search), "coder allocation in precoce programa" (Expand search), "coder allocation of precoder program" (Expand search), "coder allocation in premodern program" (Expand search), "coder allocation and precoder program" (Expand search), "coder allocation to precoder program" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder allocation in precoder program") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder allocation in precoder program\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder allocation in precoder program ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))*.