Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder allocation in loading problem" » "power allocation in loading problem" (Expand search), "order allocation in loading problem" (Expand search), "over allocation in loading problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation in routing problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation in planning problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation of loading problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation in leading problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation ii loading problem" (Expand search), "coder allocation i loading problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder allocation in loading problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder allocation in loading problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder allocation in loading problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder allocation in loading problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.