Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"models considering python python programming" » "model considering python python programming" (Expand search), "modeling considering python python programming" (Expand search), "models considering path python programming" (Expand search), "models considering carbon python programming" (Expand search), "models considering both python programming" (Expand search), "models considering pythons python programming" (Expand search), "models considering piton python programming" (Expand search), "models considering pitons python programming" (Expand search)
"coder allocation in coding program" » "power allocation in coding program" (Expand search), "order allocation in coding program" (Expand search), "over allocation in coding program" (Expand search), "coder allocation in cloning program" (Expand search), "coder allocation in loading program" (Expand search), "coder allocation in cooling programs" (Expand search), "coder allocation of coding program" (Expand search), "coder allocation on coding program" (Expand search), "coder allocation in decoding program" (Expand search), "coder allocation non coding program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder allocation in coding program") OR ("models considering python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder allocation in coding program\") OR (\"models considering python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder allocation in coding program ) OR ( models considering python python programming ))*.