Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder adaptation using examples from" » "model adaptation using examples from" (Expand search), "codon adaptation using examples from" (Expand search), "code adaptations using examples from" (Expand search), "coder adaptation and examples from" (Expand search), "coder adaptation under examples from" (Expand search), "coder adaptation using samples from" (Expand search), "coder adaptation using sample from" (Expand search), "coder adaptation basin examples from" (Expand search), "coder adaptation using example from" (Expand search), "coder adaptation using examples of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder adaptation using examples from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder adaptation using examples from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder adaptation using examples from ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder adaptation using examples from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.