Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder _ embedded coder program" » "coder _ embedded copper program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded model program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded power program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded cooper program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded proder program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded closer program" (Expand search)
"using log python python programming" » "using log pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using log piton python programming" (Expand search), "using log pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using logic python python programming" (Expand search), "using of python python programming" (Expand search), "using on python python programming" (Expand search), "using long python python programming" (Expand search), "using low python python programming" (Expand search), "using lhc python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder _ embedded coder program") OR ("using log python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder _ embedded coder program\") OR (\"using log python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder _ embedded coder program ) OR ( using log python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder _ embedded coder program") OR ("using log python python programming"))*.