Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder _ embedded coder program" » "coder _ embedded copper program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded model program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded power program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded cooper program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded proder program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded closer program" (Expand search)
"using locking python python programming" » "using stacking python python programming" (Expand search), "using tracking python python programming" (Expand search), "swing blocking python python programming" (Expand search), "using locking pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using locking piton python programming" (Expand search), "using locking pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder _ embedded coder program") OR ("using locking python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder _ embedded coder program\") OR (\"using locking python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder _ embedded coder program ) OR ( using locking python python programming ))*.