Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using effluent python python programming" » "using fluent python python programming" (Expand search), "washing effluent python python programming" (Expand search), "mining effluent python python programming" (Expand search), "dyeing effluent python python programming" (Expand search), "using effluent pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using effluent piton python programming" (Expand search), "using effluent pitons python programming" (Expand search)
"coder _ embedded coder program" » "coder _ embedded copper program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded model program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded power program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded cooper program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded proder program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded closer program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder _ embedded coder program") OR ("using effluent python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder _ embedded coder program\") OR (\"using effluent python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder _ embedded coder program ) OR ( using effluent python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder _ embedded coder program") OR ("using effluent python python programming"))*.