Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder _ embedded coder program" » "coder _ embedded copper program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded model program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded power program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded cooper program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded proder program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded closer program" (Expand search)
"setting using python python programming" » "settings using python python programming" (Expand search), "setting during python python programming" (Expand search), "testing using python python programming" (Expand search), "setting using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "setting using piton python programming" (Expand search), "setting using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "setting usando python python programming" (Expand search), "setting in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder _ embedded coder program") OR ("setting using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder _ embedded coder program\") OR (\"setting using python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder _ embedded coder program ) OR ( setting using python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder _ embedded coder program") OR ("setting using python python programming"))*.