Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder _ embedded coder program" » "coder _ embedded copper program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded model program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded power program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded cooper program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded proder program" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded closer program" (Expand search)
"in blockmesh python python programming" » "in blockmesh pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in blockmesh piton python programming" (Expand search), "in blockmesh pitons python programming" (Expand search), "cfd blockmesh python python programming" (Expand search), "in blocks python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder _ embedded coder program") OR ("in blockmesh python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder _ embedded coder program\") OR (\"in blockmesh python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder _ embedded coder program ) OR ( in blockmesh python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder _ embedded coder program") OR ("in blockmesh python python programming"))*.