Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code using segmented user programming" » "code using segmented based programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented pair programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented r programming" (Expand search), "code using augmented user programming" (Expand search), "code using segment user programming" (Expand search), "code using selected user programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented euler programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented buffer programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented tubes programming" (Expand search), "made using segmented user programming" (Expand search), "coding using segmented user programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code using segmented user programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code using segmented user programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code using segmented user programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code using segmented user programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.