Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code using segmented sugar programming" » "code using segmented user programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented modular programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented linear programming" (Expand search), "code using augmented sugar programming" (Expand search), "code using segment sugar programming" (Expand search), "code using selected sugar programming" (Expand search), "code using fermented sugar programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented euler programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented human programming" (Expand search), "made using segmented sugar programming" (Expand search), "coding using segmented sugar programming" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code using segmented sugar programming\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code using segmented sugar programming ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code using segmented sugar programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.