Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code implication of routine programming" » "code implication of reactive programming" (Expand search), "code implication of cone programming" (Expand search), "code implication of line programming" (Expand search), "code implications of routine programming" (Expand search), "code application of routine programming" (Expand search), "code aplication of routine programming" (Expand search), "code implications on routine programming" (Expand search), "code complication of routine programming" (Expand search), "code implication _ routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code implication of routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code implication of routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code implication of routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code implication of routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.