Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code decomposition process using programming" » "code deposition process using programming" (Expand search), "code compositional process using programming" (Expand search), "code decomposition rate using programming" (Expand search), "mode decomposition process using programming" (Expand search), "hodge decomposition process using programming" (Expand search), "kcore decomposition process using programming" (Expand search), "code decomposition process during programming" (Expand search), "code decomposition process single programming" (Expand search), "code decomposition process ranking programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code decomposition process using programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code decomposition process using programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code decomposition process using programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.