Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computations in coverage on" » "code computational in coverage on" (Expand search), "model computations in coverage on" (Expand search), "core computation in coverage on" (Expand search), "code computation in coverage on" (Expand search), "code computation of coverage on" (Expand search), "code computation and coverage on" (Expand search), "code computations and coverage on" (Expand search), "code computations in coverage of" (Expand search), "code computations in coverage in" (Expand search), "code computations in coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computations in coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computations in coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computations in coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.