Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computationally in coverage on" » "code computational in coverage on" (Expand search), "made computationally in coverage on" (Expand search), "of computationally in coverage on" (Expand search), "code computationally low coverage on" (Expand search), "code computationally driven coverage on" (Expand search), "code computationally and coverage on" (Expand search), "code computationally in coverage of" (Expand search), "code computationally in coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally in coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computationally in coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computationally in coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computationally in coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.