Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computationally aided coverage in" » "code computationally guided coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally assisted coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally driven coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational aided coverage in" (Expand search), "made computationally aided coverage in" (Expand search), "of computationally aided coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally video coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally wide coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally aids coverage in" (Expand search), "code computationally aided coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code computationally aided coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computationally aided coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computationally aided coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.