Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computational values coverage in" » "code computational issues coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational bases coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational analyses coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational values coverage in" (Expand search), "cfd computational values coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational values coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational values corporate in" (Expand search), "code computational changes coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational values coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computational values coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computational values coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computational values coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.