Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computational time coverage in" » "model computational time coverage in" (Expand search), "cfd computational time coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational time coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational tool coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational code coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational tools coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational the coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational live coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational time average in" (Expand search), "code computational time coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computational time coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computational time coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computational time coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.