Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computational efficient coverage on" » "code computationally efficient coverage on" (Expand search), "code computational efficiency coverage on" (Expand search), "code computacional eficiente coverage on" (Expand search), "model computational efficient coverage on" (Expand search), "cfd computational efficient coverage on" (Expand search), "some computational efficient coverage on" (Expand search), "code computational efficient overall on" (Expand search), "code computational efficient concrete on" (Expand search), "code computational efficient storage on" (Expand search), "code computational efficient coverage of" (Expand search), "code computational efficient coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational efficient coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computational efficient coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computational efficient coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computational efficient coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.