Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computational effect coverage in" » "code computational effort coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational expert coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational aspects coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational effect coverage in" (Expand search), "cfd computational effect coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational effect coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational effective coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational effect covariance in" (Expand search), "code computational effect coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computational effect coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computational effect coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computational effect coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.