Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computational designed coverage in" » "code computationally designed coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational design coverage in" (Expand search), "code computacional design coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational designed coverage in" (Expand search), "cfd computational designed coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational designed coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational signal coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational device coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational designed coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code computational designed coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computational designed coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computational designed coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.