Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computational contents coverage in" » "code computacional contexto coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational components coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational agents coverage in" (Expand search), "model computational contents coverage in" (Expand search), "cfd computational contents coverage in" (Expand search), "some computational contents coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational contact coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational conflicts coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational cnn's coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational contents coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code computational contents coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computational contents coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computational contents coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.