Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computation using conductive programming" » "code computation using inductive programming" (Expand search), "code computation using collective programming" (Expand search), "code computation using objective programming" (Expand search), "code computations using conductive programming" (Expand search), "code computation in conductive programming" (Expand search), "code composition using conductive programming" (Expand search), "core computation using conductive programming" (Expand search), "code computational using conductive programming" (Expand search), "pose computation using conductive programming" (Expand search), "code computation using reductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code computation using conductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computation using conductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computation using conductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.