Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computation reuse coverage and" » "code computation nets coverage and" (Expand search), "code computation tree coverage and" (Expand search), "code computation the coverage and" (Expand search), "core computation reuse coverage and" (Expand search), "code computational reuse coverage and" (Expand search), "pose computation reuse coverage and" (Expand search), "code computation rule coverage and" (Expand search), "code computation cusp coverage and" (Expand search), "code computation tube coverage and" (Expand search), "code computation reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "code computation reuse coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computation reuse coverage and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computation reuse coverage and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computation reuse coverage and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.