Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code computation in recurrent processing" » "code computation in current processing" (Expand search), "code computation in document processing" (Expand search), "code computation in recursive processing" (Expand search), "core computation in recurrent processing" (Expand search), "code computational in recurrent processing" (Expand search), "pose computation in recurrent processing" (Expand search), "code computation and recurrent processing" (Expand search), "code computation of recurrent processing" (Expand search), "code imputation in recurrent processing" (Expand search), "code computation _ recurrent processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code computation in recurrent processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code computation in recurrent processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code computation in recurrent processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code computation in recurrent processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.