Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code compression in inductive programming" » "code compression in disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "code compression in objective programming" (Expand search), "code compression in reactive programming" (Expand search), "node compression in inductive programming" (Expand search), "model compression in inductive programming" (Expand search), "cord compression in inductive programming" (Expand search), "code compression and inductive programming" (Expand search), "code compression of inductive programming" (Expand search), "code compression _ inductive programming" (Expand search), "code compression an inductive programming" (Expand search), "code compression in inductively programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code compression in inductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code compression in inductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code compression in inductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.