Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code compositional methods coverage in" » "code computational methods coverage in" (Expand search), "code computational method coverage in" (Expand search), "code decomposition methods coverage in" (Expand search), "code composition methods coverage in" (Expand search), "zone compositional methods coverage in" (Expand search), "and compositional methods coverage in" (Expand search), "code compositional methods clientage in" (Expand search), "code compositional networks coverage in" (Expand search), "code compositional methods over in" (Expand search), "code compositional methods coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code compositional methods coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code compositional methods coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code compositional methods coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code compositional methods coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.