Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code composition in routine programming" » "code composition in reactive programming" (Expand search), "code composition in cone programming" (Expand search), "code composition in line programming" (Expand search), "bode composition in routine programming" (Expand search), "model composition in routine programming" (Expand search), "anode composition in routine programming" (Expand search), "code composition and routine programming" (Expand search), "code composition _ routine programming" (Expand search), "code composition of routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code composition in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code composition in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code composition in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.