Talvez deva tentar algumas variações de ortografia:
"code code coverage retention function" » "code code coverage detection function" (Expandir a busca), "code code coverage extension function" (Expandir a busca), "code code coverage prediction function" (Expandir a busca), "code code coverage reaction function" (Expandir a busca), "code code coverage selection function" (Expandir a busca), "code code coverage reaction functions" (Expandir a busca), "code care coverage retention function" (Expandir a busca), "code and coverage retention function" (Expandir a busca), "code the coverage retention function" (Expandir a busca), "code cdc coverage retention function" (Expandir a busca)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in piton python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "in pitons python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "_ python python python programming" (Expandir a busca)

Você pode obter mais resultados ajustando o argumento de busca.

• Fazer uma busca fuzzy pode resultar em termos de grafias semelhantes: (("code code coverage retention function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• As palavras AND, OR e NOT pode ocasionar problemas na busca; tente utilizar as aspas: "((\"code code coverage retention function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Remover as aspas pode possibilitar buscas mais amplas: (( code code coverage retention function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.