Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code annotating in routine programming" » "code annotating in reactive programming" (Expand search), "code annotating in cone programming" (Expand search), "code annotating in line programming" (Expand search), "code annotations in routine programming" (Expand search), "and annotating in routine programming" (Expand search), "code annotation in routine programming" (Expand search), "code innovating in routine programming" (Expand search), "code annotating _ routine programming" (Expand search), "code annotating of routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code annotating in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code annotating in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code annotating in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code annotating in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.