Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code adaptation from coverage problem" » "code adaptation from covering problem" (Expand search), "code adaptation from covering problems" (Expand search), "code adaptation from coverage from" (Expand search), "code adaptations from coverage problem" (Expand search), "node adaptation from coverage problem" (Expand search), "model adaptation from coverage problem" (Expand search), "code adaptation flow coverage problem" (Expand search), "code adaptation crop coverage problem" (Expand search), "code adaptation from beverage problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code adaptation from coverage problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code adaptation from coverage problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code adaptation from coverage problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code adaptation from coverage problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.