Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"code adaptation from coverage in" » "code adaptations from coverage in" (Expand search), "node adaptation from coverage in" (Expand search), "model adaptation from coverage in" (Expand search), "code adaptation flow coverage in" (Expand search), "code adaptation crop coverage in" (Expand search), "code adaptation from beverage in" (Expand search), "code adaptation from coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("code adaptation from coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"code adaptation from coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( code adaptation from coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("code adaptation from coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.