Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computational visual coverage from" » "by computacional visual coverage from" (Expand search), "by computational visuality coverage from" (Expand search), "by computational vision coverage from" (Expand search), "_ computational visual coverage from" (Expand search), "and computational visual coverage from" (Expand search), "by computational signal coverage from" (Expand search), "by computational vegetal coverage from" (Expand search), "by computational vacinal coverage from" (Expand search), "by computational visual beverage from" (Expand search), "by computational visual coverage of" (Expand search), "by computational visual coverage on" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("by computational visual coverage from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computational visual coverage from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computational visual coverage from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.