Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computational using superconducting gap" » "by computational in superconducting gap" (Expand search), "by computational and superconducting gap" (Expand search), "by computational _ superconducting gap" (Expand search), "by computation using superconducting gap" (Expand search), "by computations using superconducting gap" (Expand search), "by computacional usinas superconducting gap" (Expand search), "by computational using superconducting tape" (Expand search), "by computational using superconducting bi" (Expand search), "by computational using superconducting and" (Expand search), "_ computational using superconducting gap" (Expand search), "and computational using superconducting gap" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computational using superconducting gap\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computational using superconducting gap ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by computational using superconducting gap") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.