Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computational in coverage on" » "_ computational in coverage on" (Expand search), "and computational in coverage on" (Expand search), "by computational and coverage on" (Expand search), "by computational _ coverage on" (Expand search), "by computational 3d coverage on" (Expand search), "by computational in coverage of" (Expand search), "by computational in coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational in coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computational in coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computational in coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by computational in coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.