Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computational efficient coverage on" » "by computationally efficient coverage on" (Expand search), "by computational efficiency coverage on" (Expand search), "by computacional eficiente coverage on" (Expand search), "by computational efficient overall on" (Expand search), "by computational efficient concrete on" (Expand search), "by computational efficient storage on" (Expand search), "_ computational efficient coverage on" (Expand search), "and computational efficient coverage on" (Expand search), "by computational efficient coverage of" (Expand search), "by computational efficient coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational efficient coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("by computational efficient coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computational efficient coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computational efficient coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by computational efficient coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.