Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computational code constructions in" » "by computational model constructions in" (Expand search), "by computational cost constructions in" (Expand search), "by computational models constructions in" (Expand search), "by computational made constructions in" (Expand search), "by computational wooden constructions in" (Expand search), "by computational adobe constructions in" (Expand search), "_ computational code constructions in" (Expand search), "and computational code constructions in" (Expand search), "by computational code construction in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("by computational code constructions in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computational code constructions in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computational code constructions in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by computational code constructions in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.