Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computational bone coverage in" » "by computational one coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational code coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational bounds coverage in" (Expand search), "_ computational bone coverage in" (Expand search), "and computational bone coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational and coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational the coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational bone coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computational bone coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computational bone coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by computational bone coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.