Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computation using resistive forces" » "by computations using resistive forces" (Expand search), "by computation in resistive forces" (Expand search), "by composition using resistive forces" (Expand search), "by computation using restrictive forces" (Expand search), "by computation using resistive memories" (Expand search), "by computation using repressive forces" (Expand search), "by computation using assistive forces" (Expand search), "by computation timing resistive forces" (Expand search), "by computational using resistive forces" (Expand search), "of computation using resistive forces" (Expand search), "_ computation using resistive forces" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("by computation using resistive forces") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computation using resistive forces\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computation using resistive forces ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by computation using resistive forces") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.