Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computation using conductive in" » "by computations using conductive in" (Expand search), "by computation in conductive in" (Expand search), "by composition using conductive in" (Expand search), "by computation using collective in" (Expand search), "by computation using reductive in" (Expand search), "by computational using conductive in" (Expand search), "of computation using conductive in" (Expand search), "_ computation using conductive in" (Expand search), "by computation using conductive ink" (Expand search), "by computation using conductive inks" (Expand search), "by computation using conductive thin" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("by computation using conductive in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computation using conductive in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computation using conductive in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by computation using conductive in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.