Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by computation in live programming" » "by computation in line programming" (Expand search), "by computation in time programming" (Expand search), "by computation in driven programming" (Expand search), "by computational in live programming" (Expand search), "of computation in live programming" (Expand search), "_ computation in live programming" (Expand search), "by computation and live programming" (Expand search), "by computation of live programming" (Expand search), "by imputation in live programming" (Expand search), "by computation in liver programming" (Expand search), "by computation in life programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by computation in live programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by computation in live programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by computation in live programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.