Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"by complexation with robot programming" » "by competition with robot programming" (Expand search), "by combination with robot programming" (Expand search), "by composition with robot programming" (Expand search), "by complexation with robots programming" (Expand search), "by complexation with goal programming" (Expand search), "by complexation with cone programming" (Expand search), "the complexation with robot programming" (Expand search), "by complexation with root programming" (Expand search), "by complexation with robotic programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"by complexation with robot programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( by complexation with robot programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("by complexation with robot programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.