Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"boosted regression in scripting processes" » "boosted regression in writing processes" (Expand search), "boosted regression in printing processes" (Expand search), "boosted regression in creating processes" (Expand search), "boosted regression and scripting processes" (Expand search), "boosted regression _ scripting processes" (Expand search), "boosted regression mind scripting processes" (Expand search), "boosted regression in scraping processes" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("boosted regression in scripting processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"boosted regression in scripting processes\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( boosted regression in scripting processes ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("boosted regression in scripting processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.