Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based implications with java programming" » "based applications with java programming" (Expand search), "basin implications with java programming" (Expand search), "case implications with java programming" (Expand search), "based complications with java programming" (Expand search), "based implications in java programming" (Expand search), "based implications with and programming" (Expand search), "based implications with based programming" (Expand search), "based implications with goal programming" (Expand search), "based implications with guava programming" (Expand search), "based implications with jalo programming" (Expand search), "based implications with jack programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based implications with java programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based implications with java programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based implications with java programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based implications with java programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.