Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based implications in structured programming" » "based implications in structured programs" (Expand search), "based applications in structured programming" (Expand search), "basin implications in structured programming" (Expand search), "case implications in structured programming" (Expand search), "based implications _ structured programming" (Expand search), "based implications of structured programming" (Expand search), "based implications in structures programming" (Expand search), "based implications in structure programming" (Expand search), "based implications in unstructured programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based implications in structured programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based implications in structured programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based implications in structured programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based implications in structured programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.