Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based implications in structure programming" » "based implications in structured programming" (Expand search), "based implications in secure programming" (Expand search), "based implications in future programming" (Expand search), "based applications in structure programming" (Expand search), "basin implications in structure programming" (Expand search), "case implications in structure programming" (Expand search), "based implications _ structure programming" (Expand search), "based implications of structure programming" (Expand search), "based implications in structures programming" (Expand search), "based implications on structure programming" (Expand search), "based implications in structural programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based implications in structure programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based implications in structure programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based implications in structure programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.