Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based implications in object programming" » "based applications in object programming" (Expand search), "basin implications in object programming" (Expand search), "case implications in object programming" (Expand search), "based implications in subject programming" (Expand search), "based implications in objective programming" (Expand search), "based implications in content programming" (Expand search), "based implications _ object programming" (Expand search), "based implications of object programming" (Expand search), "based implications an object programming" (Expand search), "based implications en object programming" (Expand search), "based implications and object programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based implications in object programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based implications in object programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based implications in object programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based implications in object programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.