Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based implication in repetitive programming" » "based implication in competitive programming" (Expand search), "based implication in reactive programming" (Expand search), "based implication in generative programming" (Expand search), "based application in repetitive programming" (Expand search), "based replication in repetitive programming" (Expand search), "based aplication in repetitive programming" (Expand search), "based implications in repetitive programming" (Expand search), "based implications on repetitive programming" (Expand search), "based implication of repetitive programming" (Expand search), "based implication on repetitive programming" (Expand search), "based implication and repetitive programming" (Expand search), "based implication non repetitive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based implication in repetitive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based implication in repetitive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based implication in repetitive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.